Page 0034

www.localis.org.uk

34

Impact: This would:

• Improve the poor care faced by older people in the health and social care

system.

• Promote much needed integration between health and social care providers.

• Ensure that incentives are aligned within single commissioning budgets to

focus on patients, thus reversing the perverse incentives that currently exist.

4.4 Flexible primary care provision

In this new landscape, stronger primary care provision is both a positive outcome

but also a necessary underpinning service. Several interviewees argued for a far

more flexible approach, drawing on often citied international examples of best

practice (see box below).

International Examples of Best Practice

Kaiser Permanente: The largest non-profit health maintenance

organisation in the United States which serves nearly 9 million people in eight

regions. It is a virtually integrated system in which the health plans, hospitals

and medical groups in each region remain distinct organisations and work

together using exclusive interdependent contracts. The key feature of the model

is an emphasis on the integration of care- combining the roles of insurer and

provider, and providing care both inside and outside hospitals. This enables

patients to move easily between hospitals and the community and allows for

the active management of patients in primary care through care pathways.110

A report found that by providing a multi-disciplinary and integrated approach

to cardiac care for 12,000 patients Kaiser Permanente has seen a 76 per cent

reduction in all-cause mortality, a 73 per cent reduction in cardiac mortality and

$30 million in annualised cost savings.111

ChenMed: ChenMed is an innovative primary care-led group practice

serving those who are older and which has optimised its delivery system for

risk- and value- based payments, as opposed to fee-for-service.112 Operating in

the United States it differentiates itself through providing specialists at every

clinic, door-to-door transportation and limited ratios of patients to doctors

(375:1 compared to the typical 2000:1113)A report found that through this model

the practice when compared to its peers had increased patient satisfaction,

boosted the amount of time doctors and patients spent together, improved

patients' medical adherence and achieved lower rates of hospital use with 40

per cent fewer days in hospital than the national average.114

Gesundes Kinzigtal: Whilst a key feature of the German health service

system is its institutional fragmentation, Gesundes Kinzigtal is a populationbased

integrated care approach. It organises care across all health service

sectors and is run by a regional health management company in cooperation

with the regional physicians' network and two statutory health insurers. The

population-based integrated care approach is designed to lead to a substantial

population health gain realised by patients' enhanced self-management

capabilities combined with intensified health promotion and prevention within

an integrated care framework.115 A recent medical report found that this was a

"promising approach" which would lead to substantive comparative savings in

relation to normal healthcare.116

110 King's Fund, Clinical and service

integration (2010)

111 McKinsey, What health

systems can learn from Kaiser

Permanente: An interview with

Hal Wolf (July 2009)

112 The Economist, "The problemsolvers" (20 September 2014)

113 Moukheiber, Z, "Concierge

medicine for the poorest", Forbes

(23 February 2012)

114 Health Affairs, The care span:

Innovations at Miami practice

show promise for treating highrisk Medicare patients (June

2013)

115 International Journal of

Integrated Care, Gesundes

Kinzigtal Integrated Care:

Improving population health by

a shared health gain approach

and a shared savings contract

(23 June 2010)

116 International Journal of

Integrated Care, Gesundes

Kinzigtal Integrated Care:

Improving population health by

a shared health gain approach

and a shared savings contract

(23 June 2010)

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044